

> But why? You haven't given me a real explanation why YOU think its
> shit? Is it because thats what your told to believe or is it what you
> genuinely believe?
>
> Do you think that someone could make a great LIIT?
>
> I aint just asking for the hell of it, but am genuinely interested as
> to why its derided in 'some' bartending circles.
>
> Once I have a few more answers, I will post my thoughts on this drink
> (can't wait to let rip, ha ha)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adam
Eeeeeeeeasy lads!! Before this thread goes around in ANOTHER circle, the
reason I personally hate LIIT's is I find it disprespectful for what we all
stand for. We try and educate the drinker, try and help them to understand the
different flavours of the spirit, to help them appreciate the different tastes
of different gins for example, fully taste the botanicals...
The LIIT takes all this and throws it away. It is pretty much the antithesis
of good bartending, shoving five opposing spirits in the same glass, when they
are good enough to be savoured alone...
That's my tuppence worth....
k:)
Current thread (84 messages):
|
- Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 11:01 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 11:15 - apetail
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 11:53 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:13 - apetail
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:17 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:32 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:37 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:40 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:45 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:51 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 14:20 - Bippo
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:15 - Nidal
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:17 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:47 - Nidal
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 18:25 - apetail
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 19:57 - Adam Elmegirab
- What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spirits? - 2006.04.24, 22:23 - apetail
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 04:15 - Thinking Bartender
- The idea vs the execution - 2006.04.25, 08:03 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 08:32 - apetail
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 08:59 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 11:25 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 11:16 - Adam Elmegirab
- "Taste" vs "Preference" - 2006.04.25, 06:31 - natter
- Re: "Taste" vs "Preference" - 2006.04.25, 08:16 - apetail
- A high failure rate. :) - 2006.04.25, 21:42 - mbanu
- Re: A high failure rate. :) - 2006.04.25, 23:59 - apetail
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 21:03 - Thinking Bartender
- Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 11:20 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:23 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:26 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:38 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:42 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:11 - Nidal
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:21 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:26 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:28 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:34 - Adam Elmegirab
-
Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:55 - shizzle_my_nizzle
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 14:01 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 14:39 - shizzle_my_nizzle
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 14:42 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:23 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 22:05 - Bippo
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.26, 08:42 - rick_1982
- Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.26, 09:58 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.26, 16:12 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 11:15 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:00 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 04:51 - rick_1982
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 10:14 - apetail
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 11:38 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:17 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:48 - Nidal
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:53 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.29, 14:04 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.29, 21:37 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.30, 01:30 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 19:16 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.28, 04:25 - rick_1982
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.05.02, 12:59 - rick_1982
- tasting with the eyes and ears - 2006.04.25, 23:56 - apetail
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.28, 22:14 - UKPhantom
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.25, 21:35 - mbanu
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.29, 09:24 - Cheryl Charming
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:09 - bartender24
Home · Drink Recipes · Bookstore · Barstore · Handbook · Web Index · Feedback
Copyright © The Webtender.
About | Disclaimer | Privacy policy