

>
> I argue that people's taste buds are totally different.
>
This is true for at least some flavours. You have something called super
tasters, tasters and non tasters. In which group you belong depends on the way
you are able to taste a certain kind of bitter substance. Super tasters like
creamy and sugar foods less than non tasters.
The amount of taste buds differs depending on age. I don't know exactly but
certain buds need to develop yet during childhood and after something like the
age of 30-40 the number will decrease.
Probably there might be something for other senses (tactile and smell) as well
creating a difference of perception due to differences in the senses.
But this does not explain all differences. There is even already some small
prove that we learn to appreciate foods while we aren't even born yet.
Carrots (and a few others but the carrots is what I can remember) is a food
which babies have a preference for if their mothers eat a lot carrots during
their pregnancy.
Some things can be explained with different senses but a lot can be explained
with learning. I know someone who is (psychological) "allergic" to cashew nuts
since she got in a traffic accident while having eaten cashew nuts before that
accident.
If your wive wants to be right she should ask which perfume you prefer giving
you an option of several perfumes among which the one she regarly uses (men
never notice what kins of perfumes their partners use). It would be very
probable that you'll like the perfume she regarly uses.
I think that preference for Cuba Libre over LIIT is learned.
Current thread (84 messages):
|
- Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 11:01 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 11:15 - apetail
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 11:53 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:13 - apetail
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:17 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:32 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:37 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:40 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:45 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 12:51 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 14:20 - Bippo
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:15 - Nidal
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:17 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:47 - Nidal
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 18:25 - apetail
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 19:57 - Adam Elmegirab
- What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spirits? - 2006.04.24, 22:23 - apetail
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 04:15 - Thinking Bartender
- The idea vs the execution - 2006.04.25, 08:03 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 08:32 - apetail
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 08:59 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 11:25 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: What's, actually, really, wrong with mixing to much spir - 2006.04.25, 11:16 - Adam Elmegirab
- "Taste" vs "Preference" - 2006.04.25, 06:31 - natter
-
Re: "Taste" vs "Preference" - 2006.04.25, 08:16 - apetail
- A high failure rate. :) - 2006.04.25, 21:42 - mbanu
- Re: A high failure rate. :) - 2006.04.25, 23:59 - apetail
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 21:03 - Thinking Bartender
- Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 11:20 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:23 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:26 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:38 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 12:42 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:11 - Nidal
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:21 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:26 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:28 - Thinking Bartender
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:34 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:55 - shizzle_my_nizzle
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 14:01 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 14:39 - shizzle_my_nizzle
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 14:42 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 13:23 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.25, 22:05 - Bippo
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.26, 08:42 - rick_1982
- Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.26, 09:58 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.26, 16:12 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 11:15 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:00 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 04:51 - rick_1982
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 10:14 - apetail
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 11:38 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:17 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:48 - Nidal
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 13:53 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.29, 14:04 - Dan the Melon Man
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.29, 21:37 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.30, 01:30 - Adam Elmegirab
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.27, 19:16 - Spellbinder
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.04.28, 04:25 - rick_1982
- Re: Not random - balanced chaos - 2006.05.02, 12:59 - rick_1982
- tasting with the eyes and ears - 2006.04.25, 23:56 - apetail
- Re: Of course they could? - 2006.04.28, 22:14 - UKPhantom
- Re: What is the issue with Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.25, 21:35 - mbanu
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.29, 09:24 - Cheryl Charming
- Re: Who really created the Long Island Iced Tea? - 2006.04.24, 15:09 - bartender24
Home · Drink Recipes · Bookstore · Barstore · Handbook · Web Index · Feedback
Copyright © The Webtender.
About | Disclaimer | Privacy policy