> Dear Q,
> agreed that this has gone on far too long but I feel aggrieved by
> much of what i consider to be your sophistry.
> angus[at]ipbartenders.com for further discussion methinks.
> Just for the mob tho'...
> hands up any managers or owners here who would let Q her work in
> their bar if he has a desire to express his human rights and talk
> about Monkey Bush, Handmaiden Blair and the like?
> Rule one for bartenders is make the guest feel comfortable and
> intense political or religious discussion tends not too... use this
> forum as an example. You have a right but there is also a time and a
> place and i think most people rading this may be amused but agree
> with me on that point alone.
> Ironic typos? Nope... got me there.
> re swearing...now who is being tenuous? And Epithet? I don't think
> so.
> Still...
The should be's and look who is judging who here in this post! This is a
place to discuss anything connected to drinks, drinking, bartending, blah,
blah, blah. So go ahead, take a wild stab at whatever cosmic force is driving
you nuts at that particular moment and express an opinion or argument in a
positive, respectful manner.
Perhaps properly phrased, one may find it prohibitive to gainful and continued
employment while expressing rash opinions or thoughts while behind the bar
tending to the imbibbing consumer's needs. Even rash isn't the correct word,
but you get the picture!
And if you are offended by the four letter exploitives, food and beverage work
is the wrong place! I can't complete a single day without our sous chef
screaming something foul at a line cook or pantry/prep person! As a matter of
fact, if it doesn't happen, something isn't quite right and it is best to tip
toe out of that kitchen unnoticed and unscathed.
Respect goes both ways. While I may not agree with you or queneau's thoughts,
expressions, theories, observations or the words used to infer the desired
intention, they are a welcome diversion to regular ho hum, and I respect them.
Peace and lots of love. ;-)