

> > Before people were anal about the Martini, they were anal about the
> >
> > Julep. Where do you think the whole "bruising the gin" thing came
> > from? :)
>
> You are being a little obscure for the majority, would you care to
> furnish us with the relevance quote?
>
> Something like: bruise the mint in my julep, but don't bruise the gin
> in my martini (or something like that).
>
Relevance quote? I don't have anything clever like that. :) What I was getting
at was that the whole bruising the gin thing was stolen from an older argument
about bruising the mint in mint juleps, and that the fact that nobody seemed
to notice that "bruising the gin" was complete gibberish (it's a *liquid*, for
Pete's sake) sort of suggests that they never really understood the mechanics
of any of these arguments in the first place, and that they were just
repeating what someone had told them without really getting any of it.
The context was that a lot of people don't really "get" juleps, and that's the
reason they're so particular about them on the rare rare rare occasions they
have a notion to drink one. So in a fit of big-headedness I wrote a post
trying to explain them, and here we are. :)
Current thread (43 messages):
|
Home · Drink Recipes · Bookstore · Barstore · Handbook · Web Index · Feedback
Copyright © The Webtender.
About | Disclaimer | Privacy policy