I think that the main issue folks are expressing here in their comments about
"Flair" bartending, is when the bartender treats the "flairing" skill as
primary, and has little or no actual skill or knowledge of mixology.
I think Teppanyaki is a decent comparison here. I have likewise met many
Teppanyaki "chefs" who could twirl a mean blade, and do moves behind the grill
that would simply amaze you... but the food they prepared was only ordinary.
If a floor-show is all you are really interested in, then by all means. But if
the cuisine is where your interests are, then you might want to try something
else. And traditional chef's, by and large, have the same issues with
Teppanyaki chefs as traditional bartenders have with flair bartenders.
I, and apparently others here, believe that the primary skill of the bartender
is in their ability to make quality drinks. If they have secondary skills that
(appropriately) add to the atmosphere of the experience, then that is icing on
the cake. There are definately no rules that say a bartender can't make good
drinks and be accomplished at the art of flair. But frankly, what I find
more amazing from a bartender, is when I visit a bar once, then go back
there a year later, and the bartender remembers my name, what I drank, and
where I sat. That is a skill I'd love to see bartenders competitions capture.
-Robert
www.DrinkBoy.com