The Webtender
Forum and Chat

 Message 20324 of 39188 in General Discussion
 Share on Facebook |  Save to del.icio.us  
Subject: Re: Red Bull/alcohol
From: Dan the Melon Man
Posted: Wed Aug 17. 2005, 11:46 UTC
Followup to: "Re: Red Bull/alcohol"  by apetail  (Wed Aug 17. 2005, 10:19 UTC)
> Aren't health risks of Red Bull just the same like other Caffeine 
> containing mixtures? That's what it is a caffeine containing drink. 

To degrees, yes. And any alternative pseudo-energy high-caffine, high sugar 
accelerant-packed consumable should also go through the appropriate tests and 
have the appropriate heart/pregnancy/scizophrenia/alcohol warnings applied to 
them.

It's Redbull+alcohol that we are picking on here, because it's the combination 
that is worse, and it's the combination that is being sold, and the 
combination that is being marketed.

I don't have to be on the paranoia bandwagon to point out that independant 
scientific tests have been made and the medical experts in several counties 
agree there is a case to argue.
I say The Corporate is behaving unethically by ignoring these warnings.

The consumers free choice only exists after the information is made 
available.

.dan.


 Current thread (37 messages):
 Message options:
 

How do I pour? What is 'cl', 'oz' and 'pt'? How should I handle glassware?.
Find the answers in The Bartender's Handbook.

Home · Drink Recipes · Bookstore · Barstore · Handbook · Web Index · Feedback

Copyright © The Webtender.
About | Disclaimer | Privacy policy