Message 14425 of 39188 in General Discussion

Share on Facebook |  Save to del.icio.us

I'm not sure I completely understand the Q's plan, other than the fact that 
he's offering help. I agree, some delegation seems to be a good idea. If we 
have a few more volunteers (and I'm already raising my hand), maybe Pal would 
consent to assigning topics to people. Volunteers could search the forums for 
the best posts, compile an answer for the FAQ and submit it for Pal's (and/or 
Q's) review. 

KemalCan

> On this note, and given that the Queneau has contributed ne'ery a 
> whisper to the bartending community in recent thymes, I hereby offer 
> my professional services as copy editor in this regard.
> 
> It seems to date that the current approach selects one pertinent 
> answer/or thread to each FAQ - and I'm not convinced that this the 
> right or most beneficial approach. What, I feel, is needed, is the 
> conglomerative appproach, selecting a variety of responses into a 
> user-friendly collation of brief scenarios. Now, this would create a 
> logistical nightmare for wee Pal, but given that such policy creation 
> is my job, and that I'm already werkin' like the proverbial b*stard, 
> some more werk wouldn't hurt. What I am suggesting, given Pal's 
> approbation naturally, is that a wee volunteer, like me, prepare the 
> FAQ forum in conjunction with Pal, and all Pal has to do is upload 
> the stuff. Heck, given the right passwerd, I can even edit it 
> according to ewer (plural) whim. Any queries/suggestions/improvements 
> can be directed to the editor (via email), which would save clogging 
> up the forum with a thread like this.
> 
> This FAQ forum will obviously, by its nature, be continuously a werk 
> in progress and will need the constant support of Webtender's users. 
> Should the regular visitors here place enough trust in The Queneau to 
> act objectively on this (and I think at this stage, y'all know I can 
> and will), I am happy to take the mantle from Pal, subject to ewer 
> approval, natch.
> 
> Just a suggestion. Lemme know what ewe all think.
> 
> PS: vote Queneau