> Not solved, because unfortunately not all the info there is correct.
> i.e an Imperial pint is 20oz, or 568ml, and an imperial oz is 28.4ml.
> Maybe I'm being pedantic, but information should be correct.
True :(
Just when the newbies think they understand the whole 'ounce' thing, we get to
point out that it's the US fluid ounce they've been talking about, not the
actual Imperial one. Many charts neglect to mention that, or actually get it
wrong by saying it's an 'Imperial/Metric' conversion.
However, although I cut my teeth on that one as a cocktail hobbyist comparing
dusty tomes, The ONLY folk that talk about fluid ounces with a straight face
any more these days are talking about the US version. All British (& colonial)
industry and 90+% of English humans have gone metric 90% of the time. The old
Imperial fluid oz is a relic of bygone days, but interesting if you have a
collection of antique recipe books & paraphenalia.
The only recipes I've seen where a pint is used are either punches, or
premixes where it translates to 'large part'. However I appreciate being
accurate, so think a small note pointing out it's 'US Fluid Ounce' and 'US
Pint' would be in order.
As an FAQ, it does seem that we do need a little bit more clarification on
'part'. Does nobody do fractions at school anymore?
.dan.