Message 8877 of 22774 in Behind the Bar

Share on Facebook |  Save to del.icio.us

> If I could have e-mailed this to you, I would have. I didn't post in 
> the thread this came from, because I didn't feel it was on topic for 
> the thread. To put my post which you responded to in context for 
> anyone else reading this, remember I was responding to another who 
> threated to come out of hiding and go on an attack just because I had 
> the nerve to originate a thread he/she? didn't like. 

Oh ... Dear ... God.

And just to put this thread in further context - I'm the attacker to whom 
Chance alludes. Threatening? No. Ironic? yes. I'll be sure to preface any 
further posts with a big yellow hazard sticker, advising that consumption of 
oh-so-arcance literary techniques can be damaging to first-time users.

For Christ's sake Chance, I was merely pointing out, right at the outset, 
where your initial thread would inevitably end up, a point which has just been 
reiterated by a couple of other posters (Dan). That ewe state elsewhere the 
intentions of ewer first post is, with all due respect, utterly irrelevant. 
The intentional fallacy don't cut much these days, as most of us tend to think 
in non-linear tangents. There is, therefore, an obvious extension to ewer 
initial point - and one which has been thrashed out here before - hence my 
link.

Now if ewe're still having problems understanding why we warned ewe (and 
dear Christ in my soup, here's the kicker, the evidence is right there in 
front of ewe Barbara), email me, and I'll phrase it in easily accesible Dr. 
Seuss verse. [Big Yellow Sticker Time]
 
 


-- 
Want some flotsam? - I gotsam.
Want some jetsam? - I can getsam.