The Webtender
Forum and Chat

 Message 22841 of 39188 in General Discussion
 Share on Facebook |  Save to del.icio.us  
Subject: Re: Returning to the source?, then why not say so
From: Dan the Melon Man
Posted: Sat Jan 21. 2006, 23:40 UTC
Followup to: "Re: Returning to the source?, then why not say so"  by Nidal  (Sat Jan 21. 2006, 16:35 UTC)
> Does it really matter? If the drinks are good then they'll stand the 
> test of time and one day people will be argueing over who invented 
> your drink!

... which is precisely why it would be nice to be able to provide as much 
accreditation as posible as we go along.
... Also virtually the only good reason to bother, I say. But if there was a 
reliable way to end exactly that argument, then conclusions like this recent 
thread
[robert] Re: The Other Bramble
would be more common :-B

In my database experiments, I've always thought it was important to try to 
provide a 'provanance' field - where it came from/was first 
seen/published/heard about. Unfortunately on a contribution-driven site, 
that's not very effective, as the complaints about Cocktaildb show.

I think that using bartender competition results would be a great idea - 
almost the only time you can get a firm name and date publically assigned to a 
drink - and its definative recipe. Possibly even an anecdote to go with it!

So everyone, you want to 'copyright' your drink (almost an FAQ) ? Easy. Win a 
competition with it and get published in the trade mags.

.dan.


 Current thread (12 messages):
 Message options:
 

Buy shakers, bartending videos, bar tools and supplies in
The Webtender's BarStore.

Home · Drink Recipes · Bookstore · Barstore · Handbook · Web Index · Feedback

Copyright © The Webtender.
About | Disclaimer | Privacy policy