The Webtender
Forum and Chat

 Message 21920 of 22774 in Behind the Bar
 Share on Facebook |  Save to del.icio.us  
Subject: Re: Stacking the glass and mixing tin to strain martinis/shots?
From: apetail
Posted: Mon Jul 13. 2009, 22:33 UTC
Followup to: "Stacking the glass and mixing tin to strain martinis/shots?"  by anonchump  (Mon Jul 13. 2009, 21:06 UTC)
In my vocabulary gross and sanitary are two different things. Sanitary is just 
an objective idea about things being clean or not. Things can be dirty to some 
amount. If something is unsanitary it says not directly something about the 
significance of the effect on health and what it does with our experience. 
Gross is unsanitary plus the impact it has on our perception. Even sanitary 
conditions can be experienced as gross.

In my opinion pouring the way you first described is not very unsanitary but 
instead mainly gross. It is because of that (consumer perception) why one 
should not use the technique. There is little (no) prove that there is any 
effect at all. But if one allows it for being a somewhat unsanitary practice 
it can be easily relativated. It won't really significantly hurt people. 
Compare it for instance with the effect of alcohol on public health and it 
being a mayor cause of unnecessary death. The fun of alcohol is, without much 
trouble, seen as enough credit to allow a high toll. Our minds has wicked ways 
to twist the values in the comparison of different sorts of risks and profits. 
Apparently we care more about the hardly relevant sanitary practices than the 
dangers of alcohol causing a lot death. More: 
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=death+causes+alcohol

Reasons for the pouring technique not being much relevant is because a drink 
in a bar or restaurant isn't really a good habitat for pathogens and it is not 
stored over long periods as well.
The number of pathogens possibly contaminating the food and entering (and 
surviving) the body is very small. The human body also has a natural 
resistance to these dangers when their magnitude is small. When eating a small 
amount of cheese, for instance, one already can be almost sure to be consuming 
some coliforms (the bacteria you'll find in faeces). If one doesn't consume 
wrongly poured mixed drinks for sanitary reasons one shouldn't do a lot other 
things as well.

When one tries to eliminate risks in the food chain one does not need to focus 
on (a) every step but only on those which are relevant and (b) on single 
actions for each risk. Health would be an unpractical concept otherwise. 
Example (milk): (a) You'll pasteurise the raw milk (and the package) but not, 
e.g. the glass from which it will be drunken. (b) after pasteurisation 
everything is killed. You don't need to pasteurise again, e.g. just before 
consumption. 
In a bar this means that you could either focus on keeping gear clean, using 
the gear properly or keeping hands clean. One also needs to focus on the 
largest risks. Social hygiene (reducing alcohol abbuse, cutting people down), 
risky ingredients (fresh products with reduced shelf live) and poisonous 
ingredients (e.g. homemade products like bitters) are examples. More: 
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=haccp

BTW, I believe that the second pouring technique (through a crack between 
glass and tin) is not only less gross but also a faster method. 


 Current thread (4 messages):
 Message options:
 

Buy shakers, bartending videos, bar tools and supplies in
The Webtender's BarStore.

Home · Drink Recipes · Bookstore · Barstore · Handbook · Web Index · Feedback

Copyright © The Webtender.
About | Disclaimer | Privacy policy